Blue Highways by William Least Heat-Moon is a wonderful lyrical description of a road trip made around the US in the late 1970s. The author lost his job and marriage at roughly the same time and decided to just hit the road. I read the book when it first came out while I was in college and I enjoyed it even more this time. If you’re at all interested in these sorts of road books, I think you’ll like this one.
Raise the Titanic by Clive Cussler is the fourth installment of the adventures of Dirk Pitt and pal All Girodano. This time the US has a ground-breaking new national ballistic missile defense system which only needs a supply of an extremely rare radioactive element to begin operation. The first problem is that the entire world supply went down on Titanic, the second problem is that the Soviets (the book was written during the Cold War) want it too. Anyway, as I’m sure you know, our hero and his pal sort out both the current action and unravel the historical puzzle. If you like other Dirk Pitt books, you’ll like this one.
The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien is a sort of semi-stream of consciousness memoir of the author’s service in Vietnam. Each of the episodes is kind of self-contained, but they do come together to form a more or less coherent whole. I was quite edified by it, but I don’t know if I’d say that I enjoyed it. It struck me as being in rather same vein as Marlantes’ What it is Like to Go To War as an insight into the emotional reaction to participation in combat rather than a straight narrative of events. A great book that I’m sure I’ll read again.
Forever Rumpole by John Mortimer is kind of two books in one. It includes the seven stories that Mortimer selected as his personal favorite in the 1993 compilation The Best of Rumpole a Personal Choice, and also includes seven new stories (in fact the last seven Mortimer wrote before passing away) of the adventures everyone’s favorite Old Bailey Hack. If you like Rumpole, you’ll enjoy these.
Lastly, was Dogging Steinbeck by Bill Steigerwald. This was a weird and ultimately unsatisfying book. Steigerwald a long time journalist from Pittsburgh took a buy-out from his paper and decided to replicate John Steinbeck’s epic journey around the country that was the basis of Travels With Charlie. While doing research before the trip, Steigerwald discovered that huge swathes of TWC were, apparently, made up out of whole cloth. For example, early in the book, Steinbeck describes meeting an old Yankee farmer on a certain date, in a certain place, and discussing Khrushchev’s banging his shoe on the table at a UN meeting. The problem is, that K didn’t bang the shoe until two weeks after Steinbeck says they had the discussion, and, in a letter home to his wife with the same date as the discussion, Steinbeck describes himself as being in a totally different place. And there are A LOT of this sort of discrepancies. Enough to pretty much prove that TWC , rather than being a non-fiction account of Steinbecks travels, was in fact, more or less a novel. OK, fair enough. Good catch. That would make an interesting magazine article.
The problem is that Steigerwald, for some reason decides to go ahead and try to replicate the (bogus) journey anyway, so we get a more or less constant litany of:
“I’m in Bugtussle Iowa, and Steinbeck says he drove here on the 12th and slept in his camper in a peach orchard, but according to a letter to his wife (or agent) he drove straight-through Bugtussle and stayed in a tourist court in Next-town-over. I slept in my Rav4 parked in the Wal-Mart parking lot”.
Since he’s not as good a writer as Steinbeck, he never really manages to make me care about his travels.
Finally there’s the third issue I had with the book was Steigerwald’s Right-Wing/Libertarian slant which he insists on inserting into pretty much every page of the book. As in:
“When I stayed in the Bugtussle Wal-Mart parking lot, I didn’t see any poor people or sign of the Great Recession so government intervention clearly isn’t needed”
I get his politics, and he’s certainly entitled to them, but if he had sub-titled his book “A Libertarian take on TWC”, I wouldn’t have read it.
Anyway, there’s three stories here: the expose of TWC , which I quite enjoyed despite being a huge fan of the book, the Steigerwald travelogue (which I found rather boring) and his Libertarian assessment of John Steinbeck which I thought was irrelevant. Oh, and there’s a bonus. After exposing the fictive nature of TWC , Steigerwald apparently expected the world of Steinbeck scholars to laud him and reward him for his effort and insight. When that didn’t happen he seems to have become quite petulant and vindictive. The final quarter of the book consists largely of extensive quotes from his correspondence (both public and private) with various people he thinks don’t take Steinbeck’s sins seriously enough. Anyway, now I’ve told you that TWC was mostly fiction, Penguin has put a disclaimer of sorts in the intro to their latest edition of TWC , so you can save your time and skip this book.
Readers who are interested in Steigerwald case against the veracity of TWC can find a pretty good summary of it here: http://reason.com/archives/2011/04/04/sorry-charley
78 for the year